
The Grounds Management Association (GMA) has reiterated its defence of Golf Course Management and Sports Turf Management degrees after Suella Braverman’s repeated criticism of specialist land-based qualifications – despite previous engagement between the Association and her office on the issue.
We are disappointed to see Ms Braverman once again questioning the value of Golf Course Management degrees, having previously described them as "dud degrees" and more recently citing Golf Course Studies as an example of a so-called "Mickey Mouse" course.
These remarks raise concerns we have previously addressed, both publicly and directly with Ms Braverman's office. Earlier this year, we strongly condemned similar comments after Ms Braverman suggested courses in golf course management did not lead to meaningful graduate employment. At the time, we made clear that such comments were inaccurate, misinformed and potentially damaging to a sector that is already facing significant skills shortages.
Importantly, our response extended beyond public statements. Following her earlier comments, we engaged directly with Ms Braverman's office to help build a better understanding of the profession, the qualifications that support it and the opportunities available to graduates entering the sector.
Our aim was to demonstrate that Golf Course Management and Sports Turf Management degrees are not novelty qualifications or academic curiosities. They are rigorous vocational programmes that equip students with highly specialised knowledge and provide a direct pathway into rewarding careers across sport, recreation and the wider land-based industries.
These qualifications are grounded in science and technical expertise, covering subjects such as turfgrass science, soil management, agronomy, environmental stewardship, sustainable water management and land resource planning. Graduates leave with the skills needed to manage and maintain the surfaces that underpin sport at every level.
The suggestion that such qualifications lack value fundamentally misunderstands both the courses themselves and the industry they serve. Employers across the grounds management sector continue to report challenges in recruiting skilled professionals, making it more important than ever that we encourage new entrants through every available pathway, including apprenticeships, further education and university degrees.
As we have consistently stated, university degrees and apprenticeships are not competing routes. Both play a vital role in developing the future workforce our sector needs. What we cannot afford is rhetoric that risks deterring talented young people from pursuing careers in an industry that offers strong employment prospects and clear opportunities for progression.
Grounds professionals are responsible for maintaining the pitches, courts, tracks and golf courses that make sport possible. From community facilities and grassroots clubs to major sporting venues recognised around the world, their expertise ensures surfaces remain safe, sustainable and fit for purpose. Without them, sport simply does not happen.
We remain proud of the students, graduates and professionals who choose careers in grounds management. We will continue to champion the educational pathways that support the sector and challenge misconceptions whenever they arise.
The value of these qualifications is evident in the careers they create, the skills they develop and the contribution their graduates make every day. That is a reality we have communicated both publicly, and privately, with Ms Braverman's office, and will continue to defend whenever necessary.
















